![]() |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Heavy hitter
|
In those pix of yours, if her 'girls' were real, they'd flatten out when she's on her back. Real breasts do that. Silicone doesn't.
lol, go back & watch her GLOW bouts from '89. At the time she was about 18 or slightly older. She even posed for a full-frontal nude shot in Playboy around that time. At that point, she maxed out at probably a "B" cup. Unless puberty hit her in her 20s (and we're talking in a major way!) the girl got work done! Not that I mind! At least hers are proportional. Hey I love big breasts but once they look like they're soccer-ball sized on a girl who looks like she only eats salads, that's a little disturbing, lol! Last edited by crack_her_back; 01-01-2011 at 11:12 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Heavy hitter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 174
|
I love Hollywood and have met her at a couple of women's wrestling coventions. She is a great lady and suprisingly tall. Just remember guys, she's been wrestling since 1984! you do the math. Yes she's had her boobs and lips done, but she looks great and the fact someone had to ask, means they did a great job!
__________________
http://cavmag.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Heavy hitter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 31
|
I liked her original boobs better. These seem to
sag more and don't look as good. Pam Anderson has the worst I've seen yet. She looks like a cow. Women should stay away from the dizzy industry and go with what god gave them. Glubber dubber boobs are meant for 300 pound ladies. If men like fake boobs and fannies maybe they should stick to the larger women that can provide them. Glubber Dubber boobs look horrible on tiny women.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|